For professionals on CBT Poland Center

Supervision

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

When it is worth going to supervision

The case is not moving. The work is going on, but there is no result, and it is unclear why.
Doubts about the conceptualisation. There is a hypothesis, but no confidence in it.
Strong reactions of your own. The client provokes irritation, pity, boredom or anxiety — and this affects the work.
An unfamiliar presentation. A case has come in from an area where you have no experience.
Ethical uncertainty. A situation where it is not clear what the right thing to do is.
Regular support for your practice — with no particular trigger, as part of the professional standard.

Formats

Individual supervision

Working through one or several of your cases one to one with a supervisor. Suitable when depth is needed: a complex case, an unusual presentation, sensitive topics you would rather not bring into a group.

Peer supervision groups

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

How peer supervision differs from supervision

In supervision there is a more experienced participant who carries responsibility for the quality of the review. In peer supervision the participants are equals: a group of colleagues reviews cases drawing on collective experience.

Library of instruments

Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000

We have gathered the instruments most often needed in everyday practice: screening, assessment of symptom severity, tracking change over the course of therapy.

The library is growing. Materials are provided as they are, for professional use.